RULER

RULER v1 is a synthetic long-context benchmark for measuring how model quality degrades as input length increases. This packaging follows the public standalone NVIDIA RULER implementation with 13 official tasks spanning retrieval, multi-hop tracing, aggregation, and QA.

Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) from NVIDIA currently leads the RULER leaderboard with a score of 0.917 across 3 evaluated AI models.

PaperImplementation

NVIDIANemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) leads with 91.8%, followed by MicrosoftPhi-3.5-MoE-instruct at 87.1% and MicrosoftPhi-3.5-mini-instruct at 84.1%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on RULER

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

RULER Leaderboard

3 models
ContextCostLicense
1120B
260B
34B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about RULER.

What is the RULER benchmark?

RULER v1 is a synthetic long-context benchmark for measuring how model quality degrades as input length increases. This packaging follows the public standalone NVIDIA RULER implementation with 13 official tasks spanning retrieval, multi-hop tracing, aggregation, and QA.

What is the RULER leaderboard?

The RULER leaderboard ranks 3 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) by NVIDIA leads with a score of 0.917. The average score across all models is 0.877.

What is the highest RULER score?

The highest RULER score is 0.917, achieved by Nemotron 3 Super (120B A12B) from NVIDIA.

How many models are evaluated on RULER?

3 models have been evaluated on the RULER benchmark, with 0 verified results and 3 self-reported results.

Where can I find the RULER paper?

The RULER paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2404.06654. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

Where can I find the RULER dataset?

The RULER dataset is available at https://github.com/NVIDIA/RULER.

What categories does RULER cover?

RULER is categorized under long context and reasoning. The benchmark evaluates text models.

Sub-benchmarks

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all long context
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
214 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
119 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
109 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
99 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
90 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
74 models