TempCompass
TempCompass is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating temporal perception capabilities of Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs). It constructs conflicting videos that share identical static content but differ in specific temporal aspects to prevent models from exploiting single-frame bias. The benchmark evaluates multiple temporal aspects including action, motion, speed, temporal order, and attribute changes across diverse task formats including multi-choice QA, yes/no QA, caption matching, and caption generation.
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the TempCompass leaderboard with a score of 0.748 across 2 evaluated AI models.
What TempCompass measures
TempCompass is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 2 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.7, with the leader reaching 0.7.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?
- Authors
- Yuanxin Liu, Shicheng Li, Yi Liu, Yuxiang Wang, and 5 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2403.00476
Abstract
Recently, there is a surge in interest surrounding video large language models (Video LLMs). However, existing benchmarks fail to provide a comprehensive feedback on the temporal perception ability of Video LLMs. On the one hand, most of them are unable to distinguish between different temporal aspects (e.g., speed, direction) and thus cannot reflect the nuanced performance on these specific aspects. On the other hand, they are limited in the diversity of task formats (e.g., only multi-choice QA), which hinders the understanding of how temporal perception performance may vary across different types of tasks. Motivated by these two problems, we propose the \textbf{TempCompass} benchmark, which introduces a diversity of temporal aspects and task formats. To collect high-quality test data, we devise two novel strategies: (1) In video collection, we construct conflicting videos that share the same static content but differ in a specific temporal aspect, which prevents Video LLMs from leveraging single-frame bias or language priors. (2) To collect the task instructions, we propose a paradigm where humans first annotate meta-information for a video and then an LLM generates the instruction. We also design an LLM-based approach to automatically and accurately evaluate the responses from Video LLMs. Based on TempCompass, we comprehensively evaluate 8 state-of-the-art (SOTA) Video LLMs and 3 Image LLMs, and reveal the discerning fact that these models exhibit notably poor temporal perception ability. Our data will be available at https://github.com/llyx97/TempCompass.
Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads with 74.8%, followed by
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct at 71.7%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on TempCompass
TempCompass Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — |
FAQ
Common questions about TempCompass.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions