TempCompass

TempCompass is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating temporal perception capabilities of Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs). It constructs conflicting videos that share identical static content but differ in specific temporal aspects to prevent models from exploiting single-frame bias. The benchmark evaluates multiple temporal aspects including action, motion, speed, temporal order, and attribute changes across diverse task formats including multi-choice QA, yes/no QA, caption matching, and caption generation.

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the TempCompass leaderboard with a score of 0.748 across 2 evaluated AI models.

Paper
About this benchmark

What TempCompass measures

TempCompass is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on multimodal, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 2 models on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.7, with the leader reaching 0.7.

Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.

Publication

Paper
TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?
Authors
Yuanxin Liu, Shicheng Li, Yi Liu, Yuxiang Wang, and 5 others
Published

Abstract

Recently, there is a surge in interest surrounding video large language models (Video LLMs). However, existing benchmarks fail to provide a comprehensive feedback on the temporal perception ability of Video LLMs. On the one hand, most of them are unable to distinguish between different temporal aspects (e.g., speed, direction) and thus cannot reflect the nuanced performance on these specific aspects. On the other hand, they are limited in the diversity of task formats (e.g., only multi-choice QA), which hinders the understanding of how temporal perception performance may vary across different types of tasks. Motivated by these two problems, we propose the \textbf{TempCompass} benchmark, which introduces a diversity of temporal aspects and task formats. To collect high-quality test data, we devise two novel strategies: (1) In video collection, we construct conflicting videos that share the same static content but differ in a specific temporal aspect, which prevents Video LLMs from leveraging single-frame bias or language priors. (2) To collect the task instructions, we propose a paradigm where humans first annotate meta-information for a video and then an LLM generates the instruction. We also design an LLM-based approach to automatically and accurately evaluate the responses from Video LLMs. Based on TempCompass, we comprehensively evaluate 8 state-of-the-art (SOTA) Video LLMs and 3 Image LLMs, and reveal the discerning fact that these models exhibit notably poor temporal perception ability. Our data will be available at https://github.com/llyx97/TempCompass.

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct leads with 74.8%, followed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct at 71.7%.

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on TempCompass

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

TempCompass Leaderboard

2 models
ContextCostLicense
1
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
72B
2
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
8B
Notice missing or incorrect data?

FAQ

Common questions about TempCompass.

What is the TempCompass benchmark?

TempCompass is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating temporal perception capabilities of Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs). It constructs conflicting videos that share identical static content but differ in specific temporal aspects to prevent models from exploiting single-frame bias. The benchmark evaluates multiple temporal aspects including action, motion, speed, temporal order, and attribute changes across diverse task formats including multi-choice QA, yes/no QA, caption matching, and caption generation.

What is the TempCompass leaderboard?

The TempCompass leaderboard ranks 2 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team leads with a score of 0.748. The average score across all models is 0.732.

What is the highest TempCompass score?

The highest TempCompass score is 0.748, achieved by Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

How many models are evaluated on TempCompass?

2 models have been evaluated on the TempCompass benchmark, with 0 verified results and 2 self-reported results.

Where can I find the TempCompass paper?

The TempCompass paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00476. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does TempCompass cover?

TempCompass is categorized under multimodal, reasoning, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

What is the best open-source model on TempCompass?

Qwen2.5 VL 72B Instruct by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team is the top-ranked open-source model on TempCompass, with a score of 0.748 (rank #1).

How recent are the TempCompass leaderboard results?

The TempCompass leaderboard was last updated in June 2026 and currently includes 2 evaluated models.

More evaluations to explore

Related benchmarks in the same category

View all multimodal
GPQA

A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.

reasoning
224 models
MMLU-Pro

A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.

reasoning
127 models
AIME 2025

All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.

reasoning
114 models
MMLU

Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains

reasoning
100 models
SWE-Bench Verified

A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.

reasoning
100 models
Humanity's Last Exam

Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions

reasoningmultimodal
82 models