The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

TempCompass

Paper

Progress Over Time

Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on TempCompass

State-of-the-art frontier
Open
Proprietary

TempCompass Leaderboard

4 models
ContextCostLicense
1
ByteDance
ByteDance
—256K$0.25 / $2.00
2
ByteDance
ByteDance
—256K$0.10 / $0.40
3
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
72B——
4
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
8B——
Notice missing or incorrect data?
About this benchmark

What is TempCompass?

TempCompass is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating temporal perception capabilities of Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs). It constructs conflicting videos that share identical static content but differ in specific temporal aspects to prevent models from exploiting single-frame bias. The benchmark evaluates multiple temporal aspects including action, motion, speed, temporal order, and attribute changes across diverse task formats including multi-choice QA, yes/no QA, caption matching, and caption generation.

TempCompass is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on multimodal, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 4 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.9.

Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.

Current leaders

Seed 1.8 from ByteDance currently leads the TempCompass leaderboard with a score of 0.869 across 4 evaluated AI models.

1Seed 1.8ByteDance86.9%
2Seed 2.0 MiniByteDance83.7%
3Qwen2.5 VL 72B InstructAlibaba Cloud / Qwen Team74.8%
OSSQwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct#4 open-weight71.7%

Source paper

Title
TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?
Authors
Yuanxin Liu, Shicheng Li, Yi Liu, Yuxiang Wang, and 5 others
Published
Abstract

Recently, there is a surge in interest surrounding video large language models (Video LLMs). However, existing benchmarks fail to provide a comprehensive feedback on the temporal perception ability of Video LLMs. On the one hand, most of them are unable to distinguish between different temporal aspects (e.g., speed, direction) and thus cannot reflect the nuanced performance on these specific aspects. On the other hand, they are limited in the diversity of task formats (e.g., only multi-choice QA), which hinders the understanding of how temporal perception performance may vary across different types of tasks. Motivated by these two problems, we propose the \textbf{TempCompass} benchmark, which introduces a diversity of temporal aspects and task formats. To collect high-quality test data, we devise two novel strategies: (1) In video collection, we construct conflicting videos that share the same static content but differ in a specific temporal aspect, which prevents Video LLMs from leveraging single-frame bias or language priors. (2) To collect the task instructions, we propose a paradigm where humans first annotate meta-information for a video and then an LLM generates the instruction. We also design an LLM-based approach to automatically and accurately evaluate the responses from Video LLMs. Based on TempCompass, we comprehensively evaluate 8 state-of-the-art (SOTA) Video LLMs and 3 Image LLMs, and reveal the discerning fact that these models exhibit notably poor temporal perception ability. Our data will be available at https://github.com/llyx97/TempCompass.

FAQ

Common questions about the TempCompass benchmark and leaderboard.

What is the TempCompass benchmark?

TempCompass is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating temporal perception capabilities of Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs). It constructs conflicting videos that share identical static content but differ in specific temporal aspects to prevent models from exploiting single-frame bias. The benchmark evaluates multiple temporal aspects including action, motion, speed, temporal order, and attribute changes across diverse task formats including multi-choice QA, yes/no QA, caption matching, and caption generation.

What is the TempCompass leaderboard?

The TempCompass leaderboard ranks 4 AI models based on their performance on this benchmark. Currently, Seed 1.8 by ByteDance leads with a score of 0.869. The average score across all models is 0.793.

What is the highest TempCompass score?

The highest TempCompass score is 0.869, achieved by Seed 1.8 from ByteDance.

How many models are evaluated on TempCompass?

4 models have been evaluated on the TempCompass benchmark, with 0 verified results and 4 self-reported results.

Where can I find the TempCompass paper?

The TempCompass paper is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.00476. The paper details the methodology, dataset construction, and evaluation criteria.

What categories does TempCompass cover?

TempCompass is categorized under multimodal, reasoning, and vision. The benchmark evaluates multimodal models.

What is the best open-source model on TempCompass?

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team is the top-ranked open-source model on TempCompass, with a score of 0.717 (rank #4).

Which model offers the best value on TempCompass?

Among models scoring within 10% of the leader, Seed 2.0 Mini from ByteDance is the cheapest, at $0.10 per million input tokens with a score of 0.837.

How recent are the TempCompass leaderboard results?

The TempCompass leaderboard was last updated in September 2026 and currently includes 4 evaluated models.