TempCompass
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on TempCompass
TempCompass Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ByteDance | — | 256K | $0.25 / $2.00 | ||
| 2 | ByteDance | — | 256K | $0.10 / $0.40 | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — |
What is TempCompass?
TempCompass is a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating temporal perception capabilities of Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs). It constructs conflicting videos that share identical static content but differ in specific temporal aspects to prevent models from exploiting single-frame bias. The benchmark evaluates multiple temporal aspects including action, motion, speed, temporal order, and attribute changes across diverse task formats including multi-choice QA, yes/no QA, caption matching, and caption generation.
TempCompass is a multimodal benchmark evaluating models on multimodal, reasoning, and vision tasks. LLM Stats tracks 4 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.8, with the leader at 0.9.
Compare leaders on the best AI for multimodal, best AI for reasoning and best AI for vision leaderboards.
Current leaders
Seed 1.8 from ByteDance currently leads the TempCompass leaderboard with a score of 0.869 across 4 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- TempCompass: Do Video LLMs Really Understand Videos?
- Authors
- Yuanxin Liu, Shicheng Li, Yi Liu, Yuxiang Wang, and 5 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2403.00476
Abstract
Recently, there is a surge in interest surrounding video large language models (Video LLMs). However, existing benchmarks fail to provide a comprehensive feedback on the temporal perception ability of Video LLMs. On the one hand, most of them are unable to distinguish between different temporal aspects (e.g., speed, direction) and thus cannot reflect the nuanced performance on these specific aspects. On the other hand, they are limited in the diversity of task formats (e.g., only multi-choice QA), which hinders the understanding of how temporal perception performance may vary across different types of tasks. Motivated by these two problems, we propose the \textbf{TempCompass} benchmark, which introduces a diversity of temporal aspects and task formats. To collect high-quality test data, we devise two novel strategies: (1) In video collection, we construct conflicting videos that share the same static content but differ in a specific temporal aspect, which prevents Video LLMs from leveraging single-frame bias or language priors. (2) To collect the task instructions, we propose a paradigm where humans first annotate meta-information for a video and then an LLM generates the instruction. We also design an LLM-based approach to automatically and accurately evaluate the responses from Video LLMs. Based on TempCompass, we comprehensively evaluate 8 state-of-the-art (SOTA) Video LLMs and 3 Image LLMs, and reveal the discerning fact that these models exhibit notably poor temporal perception ability. Our data will be available at https://github.com/llyx97/TempCompass.
FAQ
Common questions about the TempCompass benchmark and leaderboard.