TheoremQA
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on TheoremQA
TheoremQA Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 72B | — | — | ||
| 2 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 3 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 32B | — | — | ||
| 4 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 15B | — | — | ||
| 5 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 7B | — | — | ||
| 6 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 8B | — | — |
What is TheoremQA?
A theorem-driven question answering dataset containing 800 high-quality questions covering 350+ theorems from Math, Physics, EE&CS, and Finance. Designed to evaluate AI models' capabilities to apply theorems to solve challenging university-level science problems.
TheoremQA is a text benchmark evaluating models on math, physics, reasoning, and finance tasks. LLM Stats tracks 6 models on this benchmark, scored on a 0–1 scale. The current average is 0.4, with the leader at 0.4.
Compare leaders on the best AI for math, best AI for physics, best AI for reasoning and best AI for finance leaderboards.
Current leaders
Qwen2 72B Instruct from Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team currently leads the TheoremQA leaderboard with a score of 0.444 across 6 evaluated AI models.
Source paper
- Title
- TheoremQA: A Theorem-driven Question Answering dataset
- Authors
- Wenhu Chen, Ming Yin, Max Ku, Pan Lu, and 5 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2305.12524
Abstract
The recent LLMs like GPT-4 and PaLM-2 have made tremendous progress in solving fundamental math problems like GSM8K by achieving over 90% accuracy. However, their capabilities to solve more challenging math problems which require domain-specific knowledge (i.e. theorem) have yet to be investigated. In this paper, we introduce TheoremQA, the first theorem-driven question-answering dataset designed to evaluate AI models' capabilities to apply theorems to solve challenging science problems. TheoremQA is curated by domain experts containing 800 high-quality questions covering 350 theorems (e.g. Taylor's theorem, Lagrange's theorem, Huffman coding, Quantum Theorem, Elasticity Theorem, etc) from Math, Physics, EE&CS, and Finance. We evaluate a wide spectrum of 16 large language and code models with different prompting strategies like Chain-of-Thoughts and Program-of-Thoughts. We found that GPT-4's capabilities to solve these problems are unparalleled, achieving an accuracy of 51% with Program-of-Thoughts Prompting. All the existing open-sourced models are below 15%, barely surpassing the random-guess baseline. Given the diversity and broad coverage of TheoremQA, we believe it can be used as a better benchmark to evaluate LLMs' capabilities to solve challenging science problems. The data and code are released in https://github.com/wenhuchen/TheoremQA.
FAQ
Common questions about the TheoremQA benchmark and leaderboard.