Video-MME (long, no subtitles)
Video-MME is the first-ever comprehensive evaluation benchmark for Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in video analysis. This variant focuses on long-term videos (30min-60min) without subtitle inputs, testing robust contextual dynamics across 6 primary visual domains with 30 subfields including knowledge, film & television, sports competition, life record, and multilingual content.
GPT-4.1 from OpenAI currently leads the Video-MME (long, no subtitles) leaderboard with a score of 0.720 across 1 evaluated AI models.
What Video-MME (long, no subtitles) measures
Video-MME (long, no subtitles) is a multimodal benchmark that evaluates large language models on video, vision, and multimodal tasks. LLM Stats tracks 1 model on this benchmark, with a maximum possible score of 1. Current average across reported models is 0.7, with the leader reaching 0.7.
Compare leaders on the best AI for video, best AI for vision and best AI for multimodal leaderboards.
Publication
- Paper
- Video-MME: The First-Ever Comprehensive Evaluation Benchmark of Multi-modal LLMs in Video Analysis
- Authors
- Chaoyou Fu, Yuhan Dai, Yongdong Luo, Lei Li, and 17 others
- Published
- arXiv
- 2405.21075
Abstract
In the quest for artificial general intelligence, Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have emerged as a focal point in recent advancements. However, the predominant focus remains on developing their capabilities in static image understanding. The potential of MLLMs in processing sequential visual data is still insufficiently explored, highlighting the absence of a comprehensive, high-quality assessment of their performance. In this paper, we introduce Video-MME, the first-ever full-spectrum, Multi-Modal Evaluation benchmark of MLLMs in Video analysis. Our work distinguishes from existing benchmarks through four key features: 1) Diversity in video types, spanning 6 primary visual domains with 30 subfields to ensure broad scenario generalizability; 2) Duration in temporal dimension, encompassing both short-, medium-, and long-term videos, ranging from 11 seconds to 1 hour, for robust contextual dynamics; 3) Breadth in data modalities, integrating multi-modal inputs besides video frames, including subtitles and audios, to unveil the all-round capabilities of MLLMs; 4) Quality in annotations, utilizing rigorous manual labeling by expert annotators to facilitate precise and reliable model assessment. 900 videos with a total of 254 hours are manually selected and annotated by repeatedly viewing all the video content, resulting in 2,700 question-answer pairs. With Video-MME, we extensively evaluate various state-of-the-art MLLMs, including GPT-4 series and Gemini 1.5 Pro, as well as open-source image models like InternVL-Chat-V1.5 and video models like LLaVA-NeXT-Video. Our experiments reveal that Gemini 1.5 Pro is the best-performing commercial model, significantly outperforming the open-source models. Our dataset along with these findings underscores the need for further improvements in handling longer sequences and multi-modal data. Project Page: https://video-mme.github.io
GPT-4.1 leads with 72.0%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on Video-MME (long, no subtitles)
Video-MME (long, no subtitles) Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OpenAI | — | 1.0M | $2.00 / $8.00 |
FAQ
Common questions about Video-MME (long, no subtitles).
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions
MMMU (Massive Multi-discipline Multimodal Understanding) is a benchmark designed to evaluate multimodal models on college-level subject knowledge and deliberate reasoning. Contains 11.5K meticulously collected multimodal questions from college exams, quizzes, and textbooks, covering six core disciplines: Art & Design, Business, Science, Health & Medicine, Humanities & Social Science, and Tech & Engineering across 30 subjects and 183 subfields.
A more robust multi-discipline multimodal understanding benchmark that enhances MMMU through a three-step process: filtering text-only answerable questions, augmenting candidate options, and introducing vision-only input settings. Achieves significantly lower model performance (16.8-26.9%) compared to original MMMU, providing more rigorous evaluation that closely mimics real-world scenarios.
CharXiv-R is the reasoning component of the CharXiv benchmark, focusing on complex reasoning questions that require synthesizing information across visual chart elements. It evaluates multimodal large language models on their ability to understand and reason about scientific charts from arXiv papers through various reasoning tasks.
MathVista evaluates mathematical reasoning of foundation models in visual contexts. It consists of 6,141 examples derived from 28 existing multimodal datasets and 3 newly created datasets (IQTest, FunctionQA, and PaperQA), combining challenges from diverse mathematical and visual tasks to assess models' ability to understand complex figures and perform rigorous reasoning.
AI2D is a dataset of 4,903 illustrative diagrams from grade school natural sciences (such as food webs, human physiology, and life cycles) with over 15,000 multiple choice questions and answers. The benchmark evaluates diagram understanding and visual reasoning capabilities, requiring models to interpret diagrammatic elements, relationships, and structure to answer questions about scientific concepts represented in visual form.