VideoMMMU
Video-MMMU evaluates Large Multimodal Models' ability to acquire knowledge from expert-level professional videos across six disciplines through three cognitive stages: perception, comprehension, and adaptation. Contains 300 videos and 900 human-annotated questions spanning Art, Business, Science, Medicine, Humanities, and Engineering.
Gemini 3 Pro from Google currently leads the VideoMMMU leaderboard with a score of 0.876 across 24 evaluated AI models.
Gemini 3 Pro leads with 87.6%, followed by Gemini 3 Flash at 86.9% and 
Kimi K2.5 at 86.6%.
Progress Over Time
Interactive timeline showing model performance evolution on VideoMMMU
VideoMMMU Leaderboard
| Context | Cost | License | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Google | — | — | — | ||
| 2 | Google | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 3 | Moonshot AI | 1.0T | — | — | ||
| 4 |  OpenAI | — | 400K | $1.75 / $14.00 | ||
| 5 | Google | — | 1.0M | $0.25 / $1.50 | ||
| 6 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 7 |  Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 28B | 262K | $0.60 / $3.60 | ||
| 8 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | — | 1.0M | $0.50 / $3.00 | ||
| 9 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | — | — | ||
| 10 | — | — | — | |||
| 11 | OpenAI | — | — | — | ||
| 12 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 27B | 262K | $0.30 / $2.40 | ||
| 13 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 122B | 262K | $0.40 / $3.20 | ||
| 14 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 35B | 262K | $0.25 / $2.00 | ||
| 15 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | 262K | $0.45 / $3.49 | ||
| 16 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 33B | — | — | ||
| 17 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 18 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 236B | 262K | $0.30 / $1.49 | ||
| 19 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.18 / $2.09 | ||
| 20 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $1.00 | ||
| 21 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 31B | — | — | ||
| 22 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 9B | 262K | $0.08 / $0.50 | ||
| 23 | OpenAI | — | 128K | $2.50 / $10.00 | ||
| 24 | Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team | 4B | 262K | $0.10 / $0.60 |
FAQ
Common questions about VideoMMMU.
More evaluations to explore
Related benchmarks in the same category
A challenging dataset of 448 multiple-choice questions written by domain experts in biology, physics, and chemistry. Questions are Google-proof and extremely difficult, with PhD experts reaching 65% accuracy.
A more robust and challenging multi-task language understanding benchmark that extends MMLU by expanding multiple-choice options from 4 to 10, eliminating trivial questions, and focusing on reasoning-intensive tasks. Features over 12,000 curated questions across 14 domains and causes a 16-33% accuracy drop compared to original MMLU.
All 30 problems from the 2025 American Invitational Mathematics Examination (AIME I and AIME II), testing olympiad-level mathematical reasoning with integer answers from 000-999. Used as an AI benchmark to evaluate large language models' ability to solve complex mathematical problems requiring multi-step logical deductions and structured symbolic reasoning.
Massive Multitask Language Understanding benchmark testing knowledge across 57 diverse subjects including STEM, humanities, social sciences, and professional domains
A verified subset of 500 software engineering problems from real GitHub issues, validated by human annotators for evaluating language models' ability to resolve real-world coding issues by generating patches for Python codebases.
Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) is a multi-modal academic benchmark with 2,500 questions across mathematics, humanities, and natural sciences, designed to test LLM capabilities at the frontier of human knowledge with unambiguous, verifiable solutions