The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Atria Dawn Preview vs Ling 3.1 Flash

Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched at 50.8 and 51.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Shanghai AI Laboratory · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 50.8 and 51.1.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Ling 3.1 Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Atria Dawn Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Ling 3.1 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
50.8
#16
51.1
#14
49.5
#16
47.7
#25
34.3
#37
39.2
#17
36.9
#15
38.3
#11
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Atria Dawn Preview
Ling 3.1 Flash
28.1#20
29.0#13
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Atria Dawn Preview · 11 for Ling 3.1 Flash

3 shared

Atria Dawn Preview outperforms in 1 benchmarks (AutomationBench), while Ling 3.1 Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (CyberGym, SkillsBench).

Ling 3.1 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

184.0B diff

Atria Dawn Preview has 184.0B more parameters than Ling 3.1 Flash, making it 32.9% larger.

Shanghai AI Laboratory
Atria Dawn Preview
744.0Bparameters
InclusionAI
Ling 3.1 Flash
560.0Bparameters
744.0B
Atria Dawn Preview
560.0B
Ling 3.1 Flash

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Atria Dawn Preview was released on 2026-09-11, while Ling 3.1 Flash was released on 2026-09-30.

Ling 3.1 Flash is 1 month newer than Atria Dawn Preview.

Atria Dawn Preview

Sep 11, 2026

3 weeks ago

Ling 3.1 Flash

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

2w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Atria Dawn Preview
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Atria Dawn Preview vs Ling 3.1 Flash.

Which is better, Atria Dawn Preview or Ling 3.1 Flash?

Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 50.8 and 51.1. Atria Dawn Preview is made by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Ling 3.1 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Atria Dawn Preview compare to Ling 3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

Atria Dawn Preview scores DeepSearchQA: 96.0%, BrowseComp: 92.5%, CyberGym: 86.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 86.2%, WideSearch: 81.9%. Ling 3.1 Flash scores CyberGym: 87.9%, DRACO: 85.5%, FrontierSWE: 75.2%, Multi-Challenge: 69.8%, SkillsBench: 68.7%.

What are the main differences between Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.8 vs 51.1), licensing (MIT vs Unknown). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Atria Dawn Preview and Ling 3.1 Flash?

Atria Dawn Preview is developed by Shanghai AI Laboratory and Ling 3.1 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.