Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude 3 Opus
Claude 3.5 Haiku and Claude 3 Opus are closely matched at 5.3 and 10.0 on the LLM Stats Score. Claude 3.5 Haiku is 18.8x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Anthropic · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude 3.5 Haiku and Claude 3 Opus are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 5.3 and 10.0.
In the 6 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3 Opus wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Claude 3.5 Haiku is roughly 18.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku
- cost matters — it's about 18.8x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024
Choose Claude 3 Opus
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 6 exact shared results
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 11 for Claude 3 Opus
Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 2 benchmarks (HumanEval, MATH), while Claude 3 Opus is better at 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MGSM, MMLU-Pro).
Claude 3 Opus has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 18.8x cheaper than Claude 3 Opus ($15.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 18.8x cheaper than Claude 3 Opus ($75.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3 Opus is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Haiku.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 200,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude 3 Opus supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.
Claude 3 Opus can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3 Opus
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is 8 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.
Oct 22, 2024
1.9 years ago
7mo newerFeb 29, 2024
2.5 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Claude 3 Opus is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Claude 3 Opus
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Claude 3 Opus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Claude 3 Opus.