Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Command R+

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and Command R+ across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Command R+ don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Command R+ costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 3.2x more expensive than Command R+ ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 4.0x more expensive than Command R+ ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Command R+.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input tokens$0.80

Output tokens$4.00

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Command R+

Input tokens$0.25

Output tokens$1.00

Best providerCohere

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Command R+'s 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Command R+ is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

Command R+

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Command R+ uses CC BY-NC.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Command R+

CC BY-NC

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Command R+ was released on 2024-08-30.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 2 months newer than Command R+.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.6 years ago

1mo newer

Command R+

Aug 30, 2024

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Command R+ is available from Cohere, Bedrock.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Command R+

Cohere

Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Haiku

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Command R+

View details

Cohere

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude 3.5 Haiku	Command R+

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Command R+.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Command R+?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and Command R+ (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Command R+ in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Command R+ scores HellaSwag: 88.6%, Winogrande: 85.4%, MMLU: 75.7%, ARC-C: 71.0%, GSM8k: 70.7%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Command R+?

Command R+ is 3.2x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. Command R+ costs $0.25/M input and $1.00/M output via cohere.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Command R+?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Command R+ supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Command R+?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.80 vs $0.25/M), licensing (Proprietary vs CC BY-NC). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Command R+?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Command R+ is developed by Cohere.