Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber — which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-07-21.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is 21 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.7 years ago

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Jul 21, 2026

0 days ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber scores CyberGym: 83.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons