Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-LiteWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite — which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Litedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 1.6x more expensive than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ($2.50/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$2.50
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Wed Jul 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite was released on 2026-07-21.

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 21 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.7 years ago

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Jul 21, 2026

1 days ago

1.7yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

Mar 2026

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is available from Google.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (Anthropic) and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite scores CharXiv-R: 76.5%, OSWorld-Verified: 74.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 54.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 54.0%, MLE-Bench: 39.2%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is 2.7x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite costs $0.30/M input and $2.50/M output via google.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.80 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite is developed by Google.

Related comparisons