The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 4 Argon

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 5.2.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 5.2, ranking #4 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Gemini 4 Argon
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
5.2
#314
55.1
#4
Reasoning
5.3
#310
52.4
#7
Coding
4.1
#225
44.1
#4
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 4 Argon
Tool use
-4.5#204
30.6#6
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 19 for Gemini 4 Argon

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Argondon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemini 4 Argon supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Gemini 4 Argon can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30.

Gemini 4 Argon is 24 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

2.0 years ago

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.9yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Argon side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Gemini 4 Argon
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 4 Argon.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemini 4 Argon?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 5.2. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Gemini 4 Argon in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Argon?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Gemini 4 Argon supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Argon?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.2 vs 55.1), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 4 Argon?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google.

Related comparisons