Model Comparison
Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemma 3 12BWhich is better in 2026?
Claude 3.5 Haiku shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Gemma 3 12B is 25.6x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemma 3 12B — which is better?
Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) and Gemma 3 12B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3 12B is better at 1 benchmark (MATH). Claude 3.5 Haiku shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
On price, Gemma 3 12B is roughly 25.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude 3.5 Haiku also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 4 shared benchmarks
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
Choose Gemma 3 12B if…
- cost matters — it's about 25.6x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3 12B is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).
Claude 3.5 Haiku shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 16.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 12B ($0.05/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 40.0x more expensive than Gemma 3 12B ($0.10/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Gemma 3 12B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 12B's 131,072 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemma 3 12B is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Gemma 3 12B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.
Gemma 3 12B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3 12B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3 12B uses Gemma.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Gemma
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemma 3 12B was released on 2025-03-12.
Gemma 3 12B is 5 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.
Oct 22, 2024
1.7 years ago
Mar 12, 2025
1.3 years ago
4mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Gemma 3 12B is available from DeepInfra.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3 12B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3.5 Haiku
View detailsAnthropic
Gemma 3 12B
View detailsDetailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemma 3 12B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature | | |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemma 3 12B.