The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemma 3 1B

Claude 3.5 Haiku leads the LLM Stats Score 5.8 to -9.9.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku leads the overall LLM Stats Score 5.8 to -9.9, ranking #276 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.5 Haiku wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • overall performance matters — it scores 5.8 and ranks #276 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results

Choose Gemma 3 1B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Gemma 3 1B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
5.8
#276
-9.9
#346
Reasoning
6.0
#274
-11.5
#339
Coding
4.6
#191
-10.1
#245
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 4
0 of 4
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemma 3 1B
Math
10.9#235
-8.7#309
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 18 for Gemma 3 1B

4 shared

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3 1B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3 1B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3 1B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3 1B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemma 3 1B was released on 2025-03-12.

Gemma 3 1B is 5 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Gemma 3 1B

Mar 12, 2025

1.5 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemma 3 1B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3 1B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemma 3 1B.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Gemma 3 1B?

Claude 3.5 Haiku leads the LLM Stats Score 5.8 to -9.9. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3 1B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Gemma 3 1B in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Gemma 3 1B scores IFEval: 80.2%, GSM8k: 62.8%, Natural2Code: 56.0%, MATH: 48.0%, HumanEval: 41.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemma 3 1B?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3 1B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemma 3 1B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.8 vs -9.9), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemma 3 1B?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3 1B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons