The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads the LLM Stats Score 13.7 to 5.4.

Anthropic · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.7 to 5.4, ranking #231 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output

Choose Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.7 and ranks #231 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
5.4
#286
13.7
#231
Reasoning
5.6
#282
13.8
#224
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Math
10.8#241
11.9#228
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 7 for Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

1 shared

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
NVIDIA
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Sep 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 was released on 2025-03-18.

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is 5 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Mar 18, 2025

1.5 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 leads the LLM Stats Score 13.7 to 5.4. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 scores MATH-500: 96.6%, MT-Bench: 91.7%, MBPP: 91.3%, Arena Hard: 88.3%, BFCL v2: 73.7%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.4 vs 13.7), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Llama-3.3 Nemotron Super 49B v1 is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons