Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3 24B BaseWhich is better in 2026?

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base — which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) and Mistral Small 3 24B Base (by Mistral AI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Mistral Small 3 24B Base is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks

Choose Mistral Small 3 24B Base if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Mistral Small 3 24B Base is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Jun 16 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Mistral Small 3 24B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base was released on 2025-01-30.

Mistral Small 3 24B Base is 3 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.6 years ago

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Jan 30, 2025

1.4 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3 24B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3 24B Base's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (41.6% vs 34.4%)
Higher MATH score (69.4% vs 46.0%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (65.0% vs 54.4%)
Mistral AI
Supports multimodal inputs
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Mistral Small 3 24B Base in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Mistral Small 3 24B Base scores ARC-C: 91.3%, GSM8k: 80.7%, MMLU: 80.7%, TriviaQA: 80.3%, MBPP: 69.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons