The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base are closely matched at 5.3 and -0.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 5.3 and -0.3.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.5 Haiku wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku

  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Mistral Small 3 24B Base

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
Anthropic
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
5.3
#287
-0.3
#316
Reasoning
5.5
#283
-0.4
#309
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$0.80 / M
— / M
Output price
$4.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Math
10.8#242
4.6#276
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Claude 3.5 Haiku · 9 for Mistral Small 3 24B Base

3 shared

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Mistral Small 3 24B Base is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Haiku significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Mistral Small 3 24B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base was released on 2025-01-30.

Mistral Small 3 24B Base is 3 months newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Jan 30, 2025

1.6 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3 24B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3 24B Base's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 5.3 and -0.3. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to Mistral Small 3 24B Base in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Mistral Small 3 24B Base scores ARC-C: 91.3%, GSM8k: 80.7%, MMLU: 80.7%, TriviaQA: 80.3%, MBPP: 69.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (5.3 vs -0.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons