Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Nova Pro

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Pro is 1.1x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nova Pro is better at 4 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, MATH).

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Mar 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Pro costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) costs the same as Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 1.3x more expensive than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Nova Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Mar 27 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Pro accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3.5 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while Claude 3.5 Haiku is limited to 200,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Fri Mar 27 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Nova Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Claude 3.5 Haiku does not.

Nova Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Nova Pro is 1 month newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.3 years ago

4w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Amazon
Larger context window (300,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive output tokens
Higher DROP score (85.4% vs 83.1%)
Higher GPQA score (46.9% vs 41.6%)
Higher HumanEval score (89.0% vs 88.1%)
Higher MATH score (76.6% vs 69.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Amazon
Nova Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Nova Pro

Nova Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.
Both models cost $0.80 per million input tokens.
Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 300K), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.