Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Comparing Claude 3.5 Haiku by Anthropic and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Claude 3.5 Haiku shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is 5.3x cheaper per token.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).

Claude 3.5 Haiku shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Mar 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 2.7x more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct ($0.30/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Mar 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$0.30
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Qwen2.5 7B Instruct's 131,072 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct
Input131,072 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Tue Mar 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while Qwen2.5 7B Instruct was released on 2024-09-19.

Claude 3.5 Haiku is 1 month newer than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

1mo newer
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

Sep 19, 2024

1.5 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. Qwen2.5 7B Instruct is available from Together. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.30/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (41.6% vs 36.4%)
Higher HumanEval score (88.1% vs 84.8%)
Higher MMLU-Pro score (65.0% vs 56.3%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher MATH score (75.5% vs 69.4%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 7B Instruct