Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs QwQ-32B-PreviewWhich is better in 2026?

QwQ-32B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. QwQ-32B-Preview is 9.8x cheaper per token.

Verdict: Claude 3.5 Haiku vs QwQ-32B-Preview — which is better?

Claude 3.5 Haiku (by Anthropic) and QwQ-32B-Preview (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). QwQ-32B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, QwQ-32B-Preview is roughly 9.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude 3.5 Haiku also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude 3.5 Haiku if…

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window

Choose QwQ-32B-Preview if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
  • cost matters — it's about 9.8x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while QwQ-32B-Preview is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

QwQ-32B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

QwQ-32B-Preview costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($0.80/1M tokens) is 5.3x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Haiku ($4.00/1M tokens) is 20.0x more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Haiku is more expensive than QwQ-32B-Preview.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$4.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to QwQ-32B-Preview's 32,768 tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while QwQ-32B-Preview is limited to 32,768 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input32,768 tokens
Output32,768 tokens
Sat Jun 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B-Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B-Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Haiku was released on 2024-10-22, while QwQ-32B-Preview was released on 2024-11-28.

QwQ-32B-Preview is 1 month newer than Claude 3.5 Haiku.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

Oct 22, 2024

1.6 years ago

QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 28, 2024

1.5 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B-Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B-Preview's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

—

QwQ-32B-Preview

Nov 2024

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Haiku is available from Bedrock, Google, Anthropic. QwQ-32B-Preview is available from DeepInfra, Hyperbolic, Fireworks, Together.

Claude 3.5 Haiku

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.00/1M
anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $5.00/1M

QwQ-32B-Preview

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
hyperbolic logo
Hyperbolic
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.89/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.89/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $1.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

QwQ-32B-Preview

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher GPQA score (65.2% vs 41.6%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B-Preview

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Haiku vs QwQ-32B-Preview.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Haiku or QwQ-32B-Preview?

QwQ-32B-Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Haiku is made by Anthropic and QwQ-32B-Preview is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Haiku compare to QwQ-32B-Preview in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Haiku scores HumanEval: 88.1%, MGSM: 85.6%, DROP: 83.1%, MATH: 69.4%, MMLU-Pro: 65.0%. QwQ-32B-Preview scores MATH-500: 90.6%, GPQA: 65.2%, AIME 2024: 50.0%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.

Is Claude 3.5 Haiku cheaper than QwQ-32B-Preview?

QwQ-32B-Preview is 5.3x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Haiku costs $0.80/M input and $4.00/M output via bedrock. QwQ-32B-Preview costs $0.15/M input and $0.20/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Haiku and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Claude 3.5 Haiku supports 200K tokens and QwQ-32B-Preview supports 33K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Haiku and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 33K), input pricing ($0.80 vs $0.15/M), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Haiku and QwQ-32B-Preview?

Claude 3.5 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and QwQ-32B-Preview is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons