The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3.5 Sonnet cost the same.

Anthropic · Anthropic · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Claude 3.5 Sonnet is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
9 of 9
9 of 9
Input price
$3.00 / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
200,000
200,000
Released
Jun 2024
Oct 2024
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

9 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro), while Claude 3.5 Sonnet is better at 4 benchmarks (GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU-Pro).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) costs the same as Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) costs the same as Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3.5 Sonnet cost the same.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 200,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3.5 Sonnet support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-06-21, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 4 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Jun 21, 2024

2.2 years ago

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.8 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Bedrock, Google. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3.5 Sonnet side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Claude 3.5 Sonnet?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Claude 3.5 Sonnet in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%, HumanEval: 92.0%, MGSM: 91.6%, MMLU: 90.4%. Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than Claude 3.5 Sonnet?

Both models cost $3.00 per million input tokens.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Claude 3.5 Sonnet?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.