The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Anthropic · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
Released
Jun 2024
Apr 2025
License
Proprietary
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU-Pro), while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-06-21, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is 10 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Jun 21, 2024

2.2 years ago

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%, HumanEval: 92.0%, MGSM: 91.6%, MMLU: 90.4%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.