The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Anthropic · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
Released
Oct 2024
Jan 2025
License
Proprietary
MIT

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

1 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is 3 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.8 years ago

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek.