The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek R1 Zero

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Zero are closely matched at 19.1 and 16.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Zero are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 19.1 and 16.0.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek R1 Zero wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose DeepSeek R1 Zero

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.1
#213
16.0
#232
20.1
#195
16.3
#222
11.4
#161
4.3
#215
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
DeepSeek R1 Zero
23.2#133
17.5#195
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 4 for DeepSeek R1 Zero

1 shared

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while DeepSeek R1 Zero is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

DeepSeek R1 Zero significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Zero does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek R1 Zero uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek R1 Zero

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while DeepSeek R1 Zero was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek R1 Zero is 3 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

DeepSeek R1 Zero

Jan 20, 2025

1.7 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Zero side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek R1 Zero
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs DeepSeek R1 Zero.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or DeepSeek R1 Zero?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Zero are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 19.1 and 16.0. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Zero is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to DeepSeek R1 Zero in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%. DeepSeek R1 Zero scores MATH-500: 95.9%, AIME 2024: 86.7%, GPQA: 73.3%, LiveCodeBench: 50.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Zero?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek R1 Zero supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Zero?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.1 vs 16.0), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and DeepSeek R1 Zero?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek R1 Zero is developed by DeepSeek.