The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3n E2B

Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads the LLM Stats Score 19.2 to -10.1.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads the overall LLM Stats Score 19.2 to -10.1, ranking #196 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • overall performance matters — it scores 19.2 and ranks #196 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Gemma 3n E2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic
Gemma 3n E2B
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
19.2
#196
-10.1
#354
Reasoning
20.2
#179
-10.3
#346
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Gemma 3n E2B
Math
23.4#125
-6.0#311
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 11 for Gemma 3n E2B

2 shared

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, DROP), while Gemma 3n E2B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E2B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E2B

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while Gemma 3n E2B was released on 2025-06-26.

Gemma 3n E2B is 8 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

—

Gemma 3n E2B

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E2B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E2B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Gemma 3n E2B.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Gemma 3n E2B?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet leads the LLM Stats Score 19.2 to -10.1. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Gemma 3n E2B in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%. Gemma 3n E2B scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E2B?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E2B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E2B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.2 vs -10.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Gemma 3n E2B?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E2B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons