Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4 Turbo

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 2.5x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 6 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MGSM, MMLU), while GPT-4 Turbo is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Mar 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 3.3x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($10.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($30.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 Turbo is more expensive than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Mar 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4 Turbo's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-4 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Mon Mar 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT-4 Turbo does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 7 months newer than GPT-4 Turbo.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.4 years ago

6mo newer
GPT-4 Turbo

Apr 9, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

—

GPT-4 Turbo

Dec 2023

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT-4 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

GPT-4 Turbo

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher DROP score (87.1% vs 86.0%)
Higher GPQA score (67.2% vs 48.0%)
Higher HumanEval score (93.7% vs 87.1%)
Higher MATH score (78.3% vs 72.6%)
Higher MGSM score (91.6% vs 88.5%)
Higher MMLU score (90.4% vs 86.5%)
OpenAI

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs GPT-4 Turbo

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%. GPT-4 Turbo scores MGSM: 88.5%, HumanEval: 87.1%, MMLU: 86.5%, DROP: 86.0%, MATH: 72.6%.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 3.3x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output via azure.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and GPT-4 Turbo supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $10.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and GPT-4 Turbo is developed by OpenAI.