The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi-k1.5

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi-k1.5 are closely matched at 19.2 and 17.3 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Moonshot AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi-k1.5 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 19.2 and 17.3.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi-k1.5 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

Choose Kimi-k1.5

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.2
#196
17.3
#205
20.2
#179
16.5
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Kimi-k1.5
23.4#125
20.5#150
14.9#87
11.5#106
18.2#70
15.3#86
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 9 for Kimi-k1.5

3 shared

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (MMLU), while Kimi-k1.5 is better at 2 benchmarks (MathVista, MMMU).

Kimi-k1.5 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi-k1.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Kimi-k1.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Kimi-k1.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while Kimi-k1.5 was released on 2025-01-20.

Kimi-k1.5 is 3 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Kimi-k1.5

Jan 20, 2025

1.6 years ago

3mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi-k1.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Kimi-k1.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi-k1.5.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Kimi-k1.5?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi-k1.5 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 19.2 and 17.3. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Kimi-k1.5 is made by Moonshot AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Kimi-k1.5 in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%. Kimi-k1.5 scores MATH-500: 96.2%, CLUEWSC: 91.4%, C-Eval: 88.3%, MMLU: 87.4%, IFEval: 87.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi-k1.5?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Kimi-k1.5 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi-k1.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.2 vs 17.3). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi-k1.5?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Kimi-k1.5 is developed by Moonshot AI.