Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mistral Small
Comparing Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mistral Small across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.
Anthropic · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mistral Small trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.
On price, Mistral Small is roughly 20.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2024
Choose Mistral Small
- cost matters — it's about 20.0x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
19 reported for Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 0 for Mistral Small
Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mistral Smalldon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 15.0x more expensive than Mistral Small ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 25.0x more expensive than Mistral Small ($0.60/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more expensive than Mistral Small.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Mistral Small's 32,768 tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Mistral Small is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mistral Small does not.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Mistral Small
License
Usage and distribution terms
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small uses Mistral Research License.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Proprietary
Closed source
Mistral Research License
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while Mistral Small was released on 2024-09-17.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is 1 month newer than Mistral Small.
Oct 22, 2024
1.9 years ago
1mo newerSep 17, 2024
2.0 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Mistral Small is available from Mistral AI.
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Mistral Small
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Mistral Small side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Mistral Small.