Model Comparison

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Nova Micro

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Micro is 104.3x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 6 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH, MMLU), while Nova Micro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Micro costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 100.0x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.03/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.5 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 107.1x more expensive than Nova Micro ($0.14/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.5 Sonnet is more expensive than Nova Micro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Input tokens$3.00

Output tokens$15.00

Best providerAnthropic

Nova Micro

Input tokens$0.03

Output tokens$0.14

Best providerAWS Bedrock

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.5 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Nova Micro's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Nova Micro is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Input200,000 tokens

Output200,000 tokens

Nova Micro

Input128,000 tokens

Output128,000 tokens

Fri May 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nova Micro does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Nova Micro

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Micro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while Nova Micro was released on 2024-11-20.

Nova Micro is 1 month newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.5 years ago

Nova Micro

Nov 20, 2024

1.5 years ago

4w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Nova Micro is available from Bedrock.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Anthropic

Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Google

Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Nova Micro

AWS Bedrock

Input Price:Input: $0.03/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.14/1M

* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

View details

Anthropic

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)

Supports multimodal inputs

Higher DROP score (87.1% vs 79.3%)

Higher GPQA score (67.2% vs 40.0%)

Higher GSM8k score (96.4% vs 92.3%)

Higher HumanEval score (93.7% vs 81.1%)

Higher MATH score (78.3% vs 69.3%)

Higher MMLU score (90.4% vs 77.6%)

Nova Micro

View details

Amazon

Less expensive input tokens

Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Claude 3.5 Sonnet	Nova Micro

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Nova Micro.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Nova Micro?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Nova Micro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Nova Micro in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%. Nova Micro scores GSM8k: 92.3%, ARC-C: 90.2%, Translation Set1→en COMET22: 88.7%, Translation en→Set1 COMET22: 88.5%, IFEval: 87.2%.

Is Claude 3.5 Sonnet cheaper than Nova Micro?

Nova Micro is 100.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.5 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. Nova Micro costs $0.03/M input and $0.14/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Nova Micro?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Nova Micro supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Nova Micro?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.03/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Nova Micro?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Nova Micro is developed by Amazon.