The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning are closely matched at 19.3 and 7.4 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 19.3 and 7.4.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.5 Sonnet wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.5 Sonnet

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
19.3
#192
7.4
#273
20.3
#174
7.7
#265
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Claude 3.5 Sonnet · 3 for Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

1 shared

Claude 3.5 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.5 Sonnet specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Aug 31 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini Reasoning does not.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was released on 2024-10-22, while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is 6 months newer than Claude 3.5 Sonnet.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Oct 22, 2024

1.9 years ago

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.5 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Feb 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.5 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning.

Which is better, Claude 3.5 Sonnet or Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 19.3 and 7.4. Claude 3.5 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.5 Sonnet compare to Phi 4 Mini Reasoning in benchmarks?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet scores GSM8k: 96.4%, DocVQA: 95.2%, AI2D: 94.7%, HumanEval: 93.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 93.1%. Phi 4 Mini Reasoning scores MATH-500: 94.6%, AIME: 57.5%, GPQA: 52.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.3 vs 7.4), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Claude 3.5 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.