Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs DeepSeek-V3 Comparison

Comparing Claude 3.7 Sonnet and DeepSeek-V3 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 5 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, IFEval, MATH-500, SWE-Bench Verified), while DeepSeek-V3 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Mar 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

DeepSeek-V3 costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 11.1x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3 ($0.27/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 13.6x more expensive than DeepSeek-V3 ($1.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sun Mar 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input tokens$0.27
Output tokens$1.10
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3.7 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-V3's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sun Mar 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-V3 does not.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-V3

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek-V3 uses MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed).

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek-V3

MIT + Model License (Commercial use allowed)

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while DeepSeek-V3 was released on 2024-12-25.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 2 months newer than DeepSeek-V3.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.1 years ago

2mo newer
DeepSeek-V3

Dec 25, 2024

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. DeepSeek-V3 is available from DeepSeek. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

DeepSeek-V3

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.27/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.10/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Higher AIME 2024 score (80.0% vs 39.2%)
Higher GPQA score (84.8% vs 59.1%)
Higher IFEval score (93.2% vs 86.1%)
Higher MATH-500 score (96.2% vs 90.2%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (70.3% vs 42.0%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
AnthropicClaude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeekDeepSeek-V3

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3