The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking are closely matched at 24.1 and 17.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 24.1 and 17.0.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

Choose Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
24.1
#159
17.0
#207
Reasoning
23.2
#156
17.2
#199
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3.7 Sonnet · 3 for Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

3 shared

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA), while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is better at 1 benchmark (MMMU).

Claude 3.7 Sonnet shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was released on 2025-01-21.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 1 month newer than Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.5 years ago

1mo newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Jan 21, 2025

1.6 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

—

Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking

Aug 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 24.1 and 17.0. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking in benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking scores MMMU: 75.4%, GPQA: 74.2%, AIME 2024: 73.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.1 vs 17.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking is developed by Google.

Related comparisons