Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro are closely matched at 23.9 and 27.8 on the LLM Stats Score. Gemini 2.5 Pro is 1.7x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 23.9 and 27.8.
In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 2.5 Pro wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Gemini 2.5 Pro is roughly 1.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 2.5 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output
Choose Gemini 2.5 Pro
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 5 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 1.7x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Claude 3.7 Sonnet · 16 for Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, MMMU).
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 2.4x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 200,000 tokens. Gemini 2.5 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,000,000 tokens, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Pro
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is 3 months newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.
Feb 24, 2025
1.6 years ago
May 20, 2025
1.4 years ago
2mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date.
—
Jan 2025
Provider Availability
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from DeepInfra, Google.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro.