Model Comparison

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Gemini 2.5 Pro is 1.7x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, SWE-Bench Verified), while Gemini 2.5 Pro is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025, MMMU).

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance.

Wed Apr 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.5 Pro costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 2.4x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more expensive than Gemini 2.5 Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Apr 08 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.5 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.5 Pro is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Wed Apr 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemini 2.5 Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Gemini 2.5 Pro was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemini 2.5 Pro is 3 months newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.1 years ago

Gemini 2.5 Pro

May 20, 2025

10 months ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.5 Pro's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

—

Gemini 2.5 Pro

Jan 2025

Provider Availability

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemini 2.5 Pro is available from Google.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Gemini 2.5 Pro

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Higher GPQA score (84.8% vs 83.0%)
Higher SWE-Bench Verified score (70.3% vs 63.2%)
Google
Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher AIME 2024 score (92.0% vs 80.0%)
Higher AIME 2025 score (83.0% vs 54.8%)
Higher MMMU score (79.6% vs 75.0%)
AnthropicClaude 3.7 Sonnet
GoogleGemini 2.5 Pro
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Google
Gemini 2.5 Pro

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemini 2.5 Pro

Gemini 2.5 Pro has a slight edge in benchmark performance. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Gemini 2.5 Pro is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. Gemini 2.5 Pro scores MRCR: 93.0%, AIME 2024: 92.0%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 88.6%, Video-MME: 84.8%, AIME 2025: 83.0%.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is 2.4x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. Gemini 2.5 Pro costs $1.25/M input and $10.00/M output via google.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Gemini 2.5 Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($3.00 vs $1.25/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Gemini 2.5 Pro is developed by Google.