The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemma 2 9B

Comparing Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 2 9B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 2 9B trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

Choose Gemma 2 9B

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Gemma 2 9B
Google
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—
Released
Feb 2025
Jun 2024
License
Proprietary
Gemma

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 2 9Bdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 2 9B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemma 2 9B does not.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 2 9B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 2 9B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 2 9B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Gemma 2 9B was released on 2024-06-27.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 8 months newer than Gemma 2 9B.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.5 years ago

8mo newer
Gemma 2 9B

Jun 27, 2024

2.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 2 9B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Gemma 2 9B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Gemma 2 9B.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Gemma 2 9B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (Anthropic) and Gemma 2 9B (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to Gemma 2 9B in benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. Gemma 2 9B scores ARC-E: 88.0%, BoolQ: 84.2%, HellaSwag: 81.9%, PIQA: 81.7%, Winogrande: 80.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 2 9B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Gemma 2 9B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 2 9B?

Key differences include multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Gemma 2 9B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 2 9B is developed by Google.

Related comparisons