Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4.1 nano
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads the LLM Stats Score 23.9 to 1.6. GPT-4.1 nano is 34.3x cheaper per token.
Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads the overall LLM Stats Score 23.9 to 1.6, ranking #175 overall.
In the 7 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 7; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, GPT-4.1 nano is roughly 34.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
GPT-4.1 nano also accepts a larger context window (1,047,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet
- overall performance matters — it scores 23.9 and ranks #175 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 7 of 7 exact shared results
Choose GPT-4.1 nano
- cost matters — it's about 34.3x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,047,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Claude 3.7 Sonnet · 24 for GPT-4.1 nano
Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 7 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, IFEval, MMMLU, MMMU, TAU-bench Airline, TAU-bench Retail), while GPT-4.1 nano is better at 0 benchmarks.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 37.5x more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano ($0.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more expensive than GPT-4.1 nano.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
GPT-4.1 nano accepts 1,047,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while GPT-4.1 nano is limited to 32,768 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4.1 nano support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-4.1 nano
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while GPT-4.1 nano was released on 2025-04-14.
GPT-4.1 nano is 2 months newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.
Feb 24, 2025
1.6 years ago
Apr 14, 2025
1.4 years ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
GPT-4.1 nano has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-05-31, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm GPT-4.1 nano's training data extends to 2024-05-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date.
—
May 2024
Provider Availability
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT-4.1 nano is available from OpenAI.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
GPT-4.1 nano
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and GPT-4.1 nano side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs GPT-4.1 nano.