Model Comparison
Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Grok-3 MiniWhich is better in 2026?
Grok-3 Mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Grok-3 Mini is 17.1x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Grok-3 Mini — which is better?
Claude 3.7 Sonnet (by Anthropic) and Grok-3 Mini (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Grok-3 Mini is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025). Grok-3 Mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
On price, Grok-3 Mini is roughly 17.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025
Choose Grok-3 Mini if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 3 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 17.1x cheaper per token
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GPQA), while Grok-3 Mini is better at 2 benchmarks (AIME 2024, AIME 2025).
Grok-3 Mini shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 10.0x more expensive than Grok-3 Mini ($0.30/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 30.0x more expensive than Grok-3 Mini ($0.50/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more expensive than Grok-3 Mini.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude 3.7 Sonnet accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Grok-3 Mini's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Grok-3 Mini is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Grok-3 Mini support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Grok-3 Mini
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Grok-3 Mini was released on 2025-02-17.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 0 month newer than Grok-3 Mini.
Feb 24, 2025
1.3 years ago
1w newerFeb 17, 2025
1.4 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-3 Mini has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok-3 Mini's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date.
—
Nov 2024
Provider Availability
Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Grok-3 Mini is available from xAI.
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Grok-3 Mini
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Grok-3 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Grok-3 Mini.