The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Nova Pro

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Nova Pro is 4.3x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Amazon · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMMU), while Nova Pro is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

On price, Nova Pro is roughly 4.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Nova Pro also accepts a larger context window (300,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current benchmark, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 3 of 3 shared benchmarks
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025

Choose Nova Pro

  • cost matters — it's about 4.3x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 300,000 token context window

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Anthropic
Nova Pro
Amazon
Benchmark wins
3 of 3
0 of 3
Input price
$3.00 / M
$0.80 / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
$3.20 / M
Context window
200,000
300,000
Released
Feb 2025
Nov 2024
License
Proprietary
Proprietary

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

3 benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, IFEval, MMMU), while Nova Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Playground indexes and blind preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nova Pro costs less

For input processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($3.00/1M tokens) is 3.8x more expensive than Nova Pro ($0.80/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3.7 Sonnet ($15.00/1M tokens) is 4.7x more expensive than Nova Pro ($3.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3.7 Sonnet is more expensive than Nova Pro.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerAnthropic
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input tokens$0.80
Output tokens$3.20
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Nova Pro accepts 300,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3.7 Sonnet's 200,000 tokens. Nova Pro can generate longer responses up to 300,000 tokens, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet is limited to 128,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Amazon
Nova Pro
Input300,000 tokens
Output300,000 tokens
Tue Aug 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nova Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nova Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Nova Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Nova Pro was released on 2024-11-20.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is 3 months newer than Nova Pro.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.5 years ago

3mo newer
Nova Pro

Nov 20, 2024

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Nova Pro is available from Bedrock.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M

Nova Pro

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.80/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nova Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Nova Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Nova Pro.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Nova Pro?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Nova Pro is made by Amazon. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to Nova Pro in benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. Nova Pro scores ARC-C: 94.8%, GSM8k: 94.8%, DocVQA: 93.5%, IFEval: 92.1%, ChartQA: 89.2%.

Is Claude 3.7 Sonnet cheaper than Nova Pro?

Nova Pro is 3.8x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3.7 Sonnet costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via anthropic. Nova Pro costs $0.80/M input and $3.20/M output via bedrock.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nova Pro?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Nova Pro supports 300K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nova Pro?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 300K), input pricing ($3.00 vs $0.80/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Nova Pro?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Nova Pro is developed by Amazon.

Related comparisons