Model Comparison

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7BWhich is better in 2026?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Verdict: Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B — which is better?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet (by Anthropic) and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B (by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 0 benchmarks. Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet if…

  • you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMMU), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Jun 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jun 28 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is 1 month newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.3 years ago

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.3 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Higher GPQA score (84.8% vs 30.8%)
Higher MMMU score (75.0% vs 59.2%)
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Has open weights
AnthropicClaude 3.7 Sonnet
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen TeamQwen2.5-Omni-7B
Compare in Playground

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons