The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs QwQ-32B

Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads the LLM Stats Score 24.1 to 14.9.

Anthropic · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads the overall LLM Stats Score 24.1 to 14.9, ranking #159 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3.7 Sonnet wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3.7 Sonnet

  • overall performance matters — it scores 24.1 and ranks #159 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 4 exact shared results

Choose QwQ-32B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
24.1
#159
14.9
#220
23.2
#156
15.7
#211
14.0
#128
10.4
#156
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
4 of 4
0 of 4
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
QwQ-32B
16.7#194
18.1#177
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3.7 Sonnet · 7 for QwQ-32B

4 shared

Claude 3.7 Sonnet outperforms in 4 benchmarks (AIME 2024, GPQA, IFEval, MATH-500), while QwQ-32B is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3.7 Sonnet specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input200,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ-32B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports multimodal inputs, whereas QwQ-32B does not.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Text
Images
Audio
Video

QwQ-32B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is licensed under a proprietary license, while QwQ-32B uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Proprietary

Closed source

QwQ-32B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3.7 Sonnet was released on 2025-02-24, while QwQ-32B was released on 2025-03-05.

QwQ-32B is 0 month newer than Claude 3.7 Sonnet.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

Feb 24, 2025

1.5 years ago

QwQ-32B

Mar 5, 2025

1.5 years ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

QwQ-32B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-28, while Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm QwQ-32B's training data extends to 2024-11-28, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3.7 Sonnet's cutoff date.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet

QwQ-32B

Nov 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3.7 Sonnet and QwQ-32B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3.7 Sonnet
✓ Preferred
QwQ-32B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3.7 Sonnet vs QwQ-32B.

Which is better, Claude 3.7 Sonnet or QwQ-32B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet leads the LLM Stats Score 24.1 to 14.9. Claude 3.7 Sonnet is made by Anthropic and QwQ-32B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3.7 Sonnet compare to QwQ-32B in benchmarks?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet scores MATH-500: 96.2%, IFEval: 93.2%, MMMLU: 86.1%, GPQA: 84.8%, TAU-bench Retail: 81.2%. QwQ-32B scores MATH-500: 90.6%, IFEval: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 79.5%, LiveBench: 73.1%, BFCL: 66.4%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3.7 Sonnet and QwQ-32B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet supports 200K tokens and QwQ-32B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3.7 Sonnet and QwQ-32B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.1 vs 14.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3.7 Sonnet and QwQ-32B?

Claude 3.7 Sonnet is developed by Anthropic and QwQ-32B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.