Model Comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek-R1Which is better in 2026?

Comparing Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek-R1 across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek-R1 — which is better?

Claude 3 Haiku (by Anthropic) and DeepSeek-R1 (by DeepSeek) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

On price, Claude 3 Haiku is roughly 1.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude 3 Haiku also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Choose Claude 3 Haiku if…

  • cost matters — it's about 1.9x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window

Choose DeepSeek-R1 if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek-R1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.2x cheaper than DeepSeek-R1 ($0.55/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than DeepSeek-R1 ($2.19/1M tokens).

In conclusion, DeepSeek-R1 is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input tokens$0.55
Output tokens$2.19
Best providerDeepSeek
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek-R1's 131,072 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while DeepSeek-R1 is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Thu Jun 25 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek-R1 does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek-R1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek-R1 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek-R1

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while DeepSeek-R1 was released on 2025-01-20.

DeepSeek-R1 is 10 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.3 years ago

DeepSeek-R1

Jan 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. DeepSeek-R1 is available from DeepSeek, DeepInfra, Together, Fireworks.

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

DeepSeek-R1

deepseek logo
DeepSeek
Input Price:Input: $0.55/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.19/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.85/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.50/1M
together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $7.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $7.00/1M
fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $8.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
DeepSeek
Has open weights

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek-R1.

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or DeepSeek-R1?

Claude 3 Haiku (Anthropic) and DeepSeek-R1 (DeepSeek) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3 Haiku compare to DeepSeek-R1 in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%.

Is Claude 3 Haiku cheaper than DeepSeek-R1?

Claude 3 Haiku is 2.2x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic. DeepSeek-R1 costs $0.55/M input and $2.19/M output via deepseek.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek-R1?

Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek-R1 supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek-R1?

Key differences include context window (200K vs 131K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $0.55/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek-R1?

Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek-R1 is developed by DeepSeek.

Related comparisons