The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek VL2

Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek VL2 are closely matched at -0.8 and 3.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Anthropic · DeepSeek · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek VL2 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -0.8 and 3.5.

Claude 3 Haiku also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Haiku

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window

Choose DeepSeek VL2

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Dec 2024
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.8
#313
3.5
#289
-0.9
#306
-1.2
#307
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
129,280

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Claude 3 Haiku · 14 for DeepSeek VL2

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek VL2don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to DeepSeek VL2's 129,280 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while DeepSeek VL2 is limited to 129,280 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2
Input129,280 tokens
Output129,280 tokens
Sun Aug 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek VL2 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

DeepSeek VL2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while DeepSeek VL2 uses deepseek.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

DeepSeek VL2

deepseek

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while DeepSeek VL2 was released on 2024-12-13.

DeepSeek VL2 is 9 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.5 years ago

DeepSeek VL2

Dec 13, 2024

1.7 years ago

9mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. DeepSeek VL2 is available from Replicate.

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

DeepSeek VL2

replicate logo
Replicate
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek VL2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Haiku
✓ Preferred
DeepSeek VL2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs DeepSeek VL2.

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or DeepSeek VL2?

Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek VL2 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -0.8 and 3.5. Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic and DeepSeek VL2 is made by DeepSeek. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Haiku compare to DeepSeek VL2 in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%. DeepSeek VL2 scores DocVQA: 93.3%, ChartQA: 86.0%, TextVQA: 84.2%, AI2D: 81.4%, OCRBench: 81.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek VL2?

Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and DeepSeek VL2 supports 129K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek VL2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.8 vs 3.5), context window (200K vs 129K), licensing (Proprietary vs deepseek). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and DeepSeek VL2?

Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and DeepSeek VL2 is developed by DeepSeek.