Model Comparison
Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8BWhich is better in 2026?
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 3.9x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B — which is better?
Claude 3 Haiku (by Anthropic) and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH). Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is roughly 3.9x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude 3 Haiku if…
- you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output
Choose Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 3.9x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2024
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH).
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 3.6x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.07/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 4.2x more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B ($0.30/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3 Haiku is more expensive than Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is limited to 8,192 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude 3 Haiku and Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B was released on 2024-03-15.
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is 0 month newer than Claude 3 Haiku.
Mar 13, 2024
2.3 years ago
Mar 15, 2024
2.3 years ago
2d newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-10-01, while Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B's training data extends to 2024-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date.
—
Oct 2024
Provider Availability
Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B is available from Google.
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Haiku
View detailsAnthropic
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemini 1.5 Flash 8B.