Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Comparison

Comparing Claude 3 Haiku and Gemini 2.0 Flash across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

2 benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MATH).

Gemini 2.0 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Mar 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 2.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 3.1x more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3 Haiku is more expensive than Gemini 2.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Mar 13 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerGoogle
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 2.0 Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Claude 3 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemini 2.0 Flash is limited to 8,192 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Fri Mar 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3 Haiku and Gemini 2.0 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while Gemini 2.0 Flash was released on 2024-12-01.

Gemini 2.0 Flash is 9 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.0 years ago

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Dec 1, 2024

1.3 years ago

8mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 2.0 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-08-01, while Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 2.0 Flash's training data extends to 2024-08-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Haiku

Gemini 2.0 Flash

Aug 2024

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemini 2.0 Flash is available from Google. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

Gemini 2.0 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (1,048,576 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GPQA score (62.1% vs 33.3%)
Higher MATH score (89.7% vs 38.9%)
AnthropicClaude 3 Haiku
GoogleGemini 2.0 Flash

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Google
Gemini 2.0 Flash