Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 3 27B Comparison

Comparing Claude 3 Haiku and Gemma 3 27B across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

5 benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemma 3 27B is better at 5 benchmarks (BIG-Bench Hard, GPQA, GSM8k, HumanEval, MATH).

Gemma 3 27B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Mar 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemma 3 27B costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Gemma 3 27B ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 6.3x more expensive than Gemma 3 27B ($0.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3 Haiku is more expensive than Gemma 3 27B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Mar 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.20
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3 27B's 131,072 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Gemma 3 27B is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3 27B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Mon Mar 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3 Haiku and Gemma 3 27B support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3 27B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3 27B uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3 27B

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while Gemma 3 27B was released on 2025-03-12.

Gemma 3 27B is 12 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.0 years ago

Gemma 3 27B

Mar 12, 2025

1.0 years ago

12mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Gemma 3 27B is available from DeepInfra, Novita. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

Gemma 3 27B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.11/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.20/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Has open weights
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (87.6% vs 73.7%)
Higher GPQA score (42.4% vs 33.3%)
Higher GSM8k score (95.9% vs 88.9%)
Higher HumanEval score (87.8% vs 75.9%)
Higher MATH score (89.0% vs 38.9%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Google
Gemma 3 27B