Model Comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-4 Turbo

GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Haiku is 30.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while GPT-4 Turbo is better at 6 benchmarks (DROP, GPQA, HumanEval, MATH, MGSM, MMLU).

GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 40.0x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($10.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 24.0x cheaper than GPT-4 Turbo ($30.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-4 Turbo is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input tokens$10.00
Output tokens$30.00
Best providerAzure
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude 3 Haiku accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to GPT-4 Turbo's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3 Haiku can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while GPT-4 Turbo is limited to 4,096 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo
Input128,000 tokens
Output4,096 tokens
Mon Apr 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas GPT-4 Turbo does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-4 Turbo

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-4 Turbo

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while GPT-4 Turbo was released on 2024-04-09.

GPT-4 Turbo is 1 month newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.1 years ago

GPT-4 Turbo

Apr 9, 2024

2.0 years ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

GPT-4 Turbo has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm GPT-4 Turbo's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Haiku

—

GPT-4 Turbo

Dec 2023

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT-4 Turbo is available from Azure, OpenAI.

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

GPT-4 Turbo

azure logo
Azure
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $10.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $30.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Larger context window (200,000 tokens)
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
OpenAI
Higher DROP score (86.0% vs 78.4%)
Higher GPQA score (48.0% vs 33.3%)
Higher HumanEval score (87.1% vs 75.9%)
Higher MATH score (72.6% vs 38.9%)
Higher MGSM score (88.5% vs 75.1%)
Higher MMLU score (86.5% vs 75.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
OpenAI
GPT-4 Turbo

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-4 Turbo

GPT-4 Turbo significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic and GPT-4 Turbo is made by OpenAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%. GPT-4 Turbo scores MGSM: 88.5%, HumanEval: 87.1%, MMLU: 86.5%, DROP: 86.0%, MATH: 72.6%.
Claude 3 Haiku is 40.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic. GPT-4 Turbo costs $10.00/M input and $30.00/M output via azure.
Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and GPT-4 Turbo supports 128K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 128K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $10.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and GPT-4 Turbo is developed by OpenAI.