The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-6 Rosalind

Comparing Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Anthropic · OpenAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

On price, Claude 3 Haiku is roughly 60.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Haiku

  • cost matters — it's about 60.0x cheaper per token

Choose GPT-6 Rosalind

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.25 / M
$15.00 / M
Output price
$1.25 / M
$75.00 / M
Context window
200,000
—

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Claude 3 Haiku · 0 for GPT-6 Rosalind

No common benchmarks found

Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalinddon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 60.0x cheaper than GPT-6 Rosalind ($15.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 60.0x cheaper than GPT-6 Rosalind ($75.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, GPT-6 Rosalind is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Nov 03 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerOpenAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
OpenAI
GPT-6 Rosalind
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Nov 03 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

GPT-6 Rosalind

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

GPT-6 Rosalind

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while GPT-6 Rosalind was released on 2026-10-30.

GPT-6 Rosalind is 32 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.6 years ago

GPT-6 Rosalind

Oct 30, 2026

2 days ago

2.6yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. GPT-6 Rosalind is available from OpenAI.

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

GPT-6 Rosalind

openai logo
OpenAI
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Haiku
✓ Preferred
GPT-6 Rosalind
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs GPT-6 Rosalind.

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or GPT-6 Rosalind?

Claude 3 Haiku (Anthropic) and GPT-6 Rosalind (OpenAI) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Claude 3 Haiku compare to GPT-6 Rosalind in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%.

Is Claude 3 Haiku cheaper than GPT-6 Rosalind?

Claude 3 Haiku is 60.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic. GPT-6 Rosalind costs $15.00/M input and $75.00/M output via openai.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind?

Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and GPT-6 Rosalind supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind?

Key differences include input pricing ($0.25 vs $15.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and GPT-6 Rosalind?

Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and GPT-6 Rosalind is developed by OpenAI.