Model Comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba 1.5 Large shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude 3 Haiku is 7.0x cheaper per token.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

4 benchmarks

Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 1 benchmarks (GSM8k), while Jamba 1.5 Large is better at 3 benchmarks (ARC-C, GPQA, MMLU).

Jamba 1.5 Large shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Apr 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens) is 8.0x cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large ($2.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens) is 6.4x cheaper than Jamba 1.5 Large ($8.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Jamba 1.5 Large is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Apr 04 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$8.00
Best providerAWS Bedrock
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Jamba 1.5 Large accepts 256,000 input tokens compared to Claude 3 Haiku's 200,000 tokens. Jamba 1.5 Large can generate longer responses up to 256,000 tokens, while Claude 3 Haiku is limited to 200,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sat Apr 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas Jamba 1.5 Large does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Jamba 1.5 Large

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Jamba 1.5 Large uses Jamba Open Model License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba Open Model License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while Jamba 1.5 Large was released on 2024-08-22.

Jamba 1.5 Large is 5 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.1 years ago

Jamba 1.5 Large

Aug 22, 2024

1.6 years ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Jamba 1.5 Large has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-03-05, while Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Jamba 1.5 Large's training data extends to 2024-03-05, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Haiku

—

Jamba 1.5 Large

Mar 2024

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Jamba 1.5 Large is available from Bedrock, Google.

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M

Jamba 1.5 Large

bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $8.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Anthropic
Supports multimodal inputs
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens
Higher GSM8k score (88.9% vs 87.0%)
AI21 Labs
Larger context window (256,000 tokens)
Has open weights
Higher ARC-C score (93.0% vs 89.2%)
Higher GPQA score (36.9% vs 33.3%)
Higher MMLU score (81.2% vs 75.2%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
AI21 Labs
Jamba 1.5 Large

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs Jamba 1.5 Large

Jamba 1.5 Large shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks. Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Jamba 1.5 Large is made by AI21 Labs. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.
Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%. Jamba 1.5 Large scores ARC-C: 93.0%, GSM8k: 87.0%, MMLU: 81.2%, Arena Hard: 65.4%, TruthfulQA: 58.3%.
Claude 3 Haiku is 8.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude 3 Haiku costs $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output via anthropic. Jamba 1.5 Large costs $2.00/M input and $8.00/M output via bedrock.
Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Jamba 1.5 Large supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.
Key differences include context window (200K vs 256K), input pricing ($0.25 vs $2.00/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs Jamba Open Model License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.
Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Jamba 1.5 Large is developed by AI21 Labs.