The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Haiku vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning leads the LLM Stats Score 7.4 to -1.2.

Anthropic · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning leads the overall LLM Stats Score 7.4 to -1.2, ranking #274 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Phi 4 Mini Reasoning wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Haiku

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output

Choose Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

  • overall performance matters — it scores 7.4 and ranks #274 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-1.2
#319
7.4
#274
-1.3
#312
7.7
#266
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Claude 3 Haiku · 3 for Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

1 shared

Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Sep 02 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Mini Reasoning does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while Phi 4 Mini Reasoning was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is 14 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.5 years ago

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-02-01, while Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Mini Reasoning's training data extends to 2025-02-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Haiku

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning

Feb 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Mini Reasoning
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs Phi 4 Mini Reasoning.

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Phi 4 Mini Reasoning leads the LLM Stats Score 7.4 to -1.2. Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Haiku compare to Phi 4 Mini Reasoning in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%. Phi 4 Mini Reasoning scores MATH-500: 94.6%, AIME: 57.5%, GPQA: 52.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-1.2 vs 7.4), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning?

Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Phi 4 Mini Reasoning is developed by Microsoft.