The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Haiku vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 15.4 to -0.8.

Anthropic · Microsoft · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.4 to -0.8, ranking #209 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Haiku

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.25/M input and $1.25/M output

Choose Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.4 and ranks #209 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Apr 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
-0.8
#313
15.4
#209
-0.9
#306
15.6
#204
0.7
#221
5.7
#180
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.25 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.25 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude 3 Haiku
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
4.8#267
18.3#168
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

10 reported for Claude 3 Haiku · 11 for Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

1 shared

Claude 3 Haiku outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Haiku specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Aug 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Claude 3 Haiku supports multimodal inputs, whereas Phi 4 Reasoning Plus does not.

Claude 3 Haiku can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Haiku is licensed under a proprietary license, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13, while Phi 4 Reasoning Plus was released on 2025-04-30.

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is 14 months newer than Claude 3 Haiku.

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.5 years ago

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Apr 30, 2025

1.3 years ago

1.1yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-03-01, while Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Phi 4 Reasoning Plus's training data extends to 2025-03-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Haiku's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Haiku

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus

Mar 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Haiku
✓ Preferred
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Haiku vs Phi 4 Reasoning Plus.

Which is better, Claude 3 Haiku or Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads the LLM Stats Score 15.4 to -0.8. Claude 3 Haiku is made by Anthropic and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is made by Microsoft. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Haiku compare to Phi 4 Reasoning Plus in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Haiku scores ARC-C: 89.2%, GSM8k: 88.9%, HellaSwag: 85.9%, DROP: 78.4%, HumanEval: 75.9%. Phi 4 Reasoning Plus scores FlenQA: 97.9%, HumanEval+: 92.3%, IFEval: 84.9%, OmniMath: 81.9%, AIME 2024: 81.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Claude 3 Haiku supports 200K tokens and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-0.8 vs 15.4), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Haiku and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus?

Claude 3 Haiku is developed by Anthropic and Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is developed by Microsoft.