Claude 3 Opus vs Claude 3 Haiku Comparison

Comparing Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3 Haiku across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

10 benchmarks

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 10 benchmarks (ARC-C, BIG-Bench Hard, DROP, GPQA, GSM8k, HellaSwag, HumanEval, MATH, MGSM, MMLU), while Claude 3 Haiku is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude 3 Haiku costs less

For input processing, Claude 3 Opus ($15.00/1M tokens) is 60.0x more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku ($0.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude 3 Opus ($75.00/1M tokens) is 60.0x more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku ($1.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Claude 3 Opus is more expensive than Claude 3 Haiku.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input tokens$15.00
Output tokens$75.00
Best providerAnthropic
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input tokens$0.25
Output tokens$1.25
Best providerAnthropic
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 200,000 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 200,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Wed Mar 18 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3 Haiku support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Claude 3 Haiku

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

Claude 3 Haiku

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Claude 3 Haiku was released on 2024-03-13.

Claude 3 Haiku is 0 month newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.0 years ago

Claude 3 Haiku

Mar 13, 2024

2.0 years ago

1w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Claude 3 Opus is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Claude 3 Haiku is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. The availability of providers can affect quality of the model and reliability.

Claude 3 Opus

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $15.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $75.00/1M

Claude 3 Haiku

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
bedrock logo
AWS Bedrock
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Key Takeaways

Higher ARC-C score (96.4% vs 89.2%)
Higher BIG-Bench Hard score (86.8% vs 73.7%)
Higher DROP score (83.1% vs 78.4%)
Higher GPQA score (50.4% vs 33.3%)
Higher GSM8k score (95.0% vs 88.9%)
Higher HellaSwag score (95.4% vs 85.9%)
Higher HumanEval score (84.9% vs 75.9%)
Higher MATH score (60.1% vs 38.9%)
Higher MGSM score (90.7% vs 75.1%)
Higher MMLU score (86.8% vs 75.2%)
Less expensive input tokens
Less expensive output tokens

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
Claude 3 Haiku