The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Claude 3 Opus leads the LLM Stats Score 10.0 to -5.0.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude 3 Opus leads the overall LLM Stats Score 10.0 to -5.0, ranking #256 overall.

In the 9 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude 3 Opus wins 9; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude 3 Opus

  • overall performance matters — it scores 10.0 and ranks #256 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 9 of 9 exact shared results

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude 3 Opus
Anthropic
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
10.0
#256
-5.0
#344
Reasoning
9.9
#249
-5.8
#338
Coding
5.2
#196
0.0
#232
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
9 of 9
0 of 9
Input price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$75.00 / M
— / M
Context window
200,000
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Claude 3 Opus
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Math
16.4#199
-0.9#293
Finance
14.5#123
-3.9#201
Legal
14.5#108
-3.9#187
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

11 reported for Claude 3 Opus · 28 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

9 shared

Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 9 benchmarks (ARC-C, BIG-Bench Hard, DROP, GPQA, HellaSwag, HumanEval, MGSM, MMLU, MMLU-Pro), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude 3 Opus significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Claude 3 Opus specifies input context (200,000 tokens). Only Claude 3 Opus specifies output context (200,000 tokens).

Anthropic
Claude 3 Opus
Input200,000 tokens
Output200,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude 3 Opus

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Claude 3 Opus is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Claude 3 Opus

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 15 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.

Claude 3 Opus

Feb 29, 2024

2.5 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date.

Claude 3 Opus

—

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude 3 Opus
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Claude 3 Opus or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude 3 Opus leads the LLM Stats Score 10.0 to -5.0. Claude 3 Opus is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude 3 Opus compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Claude 3 Opus scores ARC-C: 96.4%, HellaSwag: 95.4%, GSM8k: 95.0%, MGSM: 90.7%, BIG-Bench Hard: 86.8%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude 3 Opus supports 200K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (10.0 vs -5.0), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Claude 3 Opus is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google.

Related comparisons