Model Comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Grok-3Which is better in 2026?
Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Grok-3 is 5.0x cheaper per token.
Verdict: Claude 3 Opus vs Grok-3 — which is better?
Claude 3 Opus (by Anthropic) and Grok-3 (by xAI) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA). Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, Grok-3 is roughly 5.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Claude 3 Opus also accepts a larger context window (200,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose Claude 3 Opus if…
- you process long inputs — it offers a 200,000 token context window
Choose Grok-3 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 1 of 1 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 5.0x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Feb 2025
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
Claude 3 Opus outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Grok-3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Claude 3 Opus ($15.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Grok-3 ($3.00/1M tokens).
For output processing, Claude 3 Opus ($75.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x more expensive than Grok-3 ($15.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Claude 3 Opus is more expensive than Grok-3.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Claude 3 Opus accepts 200,000 input tokens compared to Grok-3's 128,000 tokens. Claude 3 Opus can generate longer responses up to 200,000 tokens, while Grok-3 is limited to 8,000 tokens.
Input Capabilities
Supported data types and modalities
Both Claude 3 Opus and Grok-3 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Claude 3 Opus
Grok-3
License
Usage and distribution terms
Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.
Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.
Proprietary
Closed source
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Claude 3 Opus was released on 2024-02-29, while Grok-3 was released on 2025-02-17.
Grok-3 is 12 months newer than Claude 3 Opus.
Feb 29, 2024
2.3 years ago
Feb 17, 2025
1.4 years ago
11mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Grok-3 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-11-17, while Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Grok-3's training data extends to 2024-11-17, but cannot make a direct comparison without Claude 3 Opus's cutoff date.
—
Nov 2024
Provider Availability
Claude 3 Opus is available from Anthropic, Bedrock, Google. Grok-3 is available from xAI.
Claude 3 Opus
Grok-3
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
Claude 3 Opus
View detailsAnthropic
Detailed Comparison
Interactive Arena
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Claude 3 Opus and Grok-3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about Claude 3 Opus vs Grok-3.